Who Really Has Influence?
Rabbi Melanie Aron
Friday, October 20, 2006
A survey done a couple of years ago asked Jewish college students who
influenced them in what they felt about their religion: 84% said their
father, 88 % said their mother, and 30% said their rabbi.
On the one hand, if you are a rabbi, this could be a depressing
statistic. All those hours with the Bar and Bat Mitzvah students, all
those late nights on the Confirmation weekend, and only 30% of the kids
felt rabbis were an important influence. My husband, by way of comfort,
pointed out that only 50% of American Jews are affiliated. I guess it’s
hard for a rabbi to be a positive influence when families are not part
of the congregation. Well, at least rabbis came out higher than
television.
As a rabbi I may have had my twinge of disappointment with this survey,
but as a parent, I was delighted. The survey confirmed the importance of
what goes on at home. It may remind those of us who are now adults of
the influence our own parents had on our religious development. Whether
we practice our religion in the same way as our parents, or even
practice a different religion, I imagine many of us can recognize the
traces of parental influence.
The survey can also be a goad to our own activity as parents and for
those in mentoring relationships with young people. Rather than leaving
religion to the experts, it gives parents the incentive to keep a hand
in on this important topic whatever your children’s age. Often as a
parent you feel that your words don’t mean much to your kids, that they
listen to everyone else more than they are paying attention to you. It
starts when they come home from pre-school enthralled with their
teacher’s wisdom, and only gets worse as they get older, moderating
sometimes when they have their own kids. I know parents often ask me to
tell their child something that they don’t think the child will pay
attention to from their own mom or dad. Though I am usually willing to
give it a shot, I don’t find it that efficacious. A survey like this
makes me wonder if parents aren’t selling themselves short.
This marked difference between the influence of parents versus rabbis,
makes me wonder also about the influence of home versus synagogue and of
community versus authority. Many forces conspire to bring Jewish
activities from the home to the synagogue but this survey makes me
wonder if we shouldn’t push back.
In earlier generations the mitzvah of teaching your children was
understood to require direct action on the part of the parents. As a
parent it was your obligation to teach your children, and though you
were certainly allowed to send your child to school, (a system of Jewish
community based schooling having been established 1800 years ago), even
if you sent your child to school, you were still required to also teach
them yourself. In many families throughout history this was accomplished
by the father reviewing the week’s studies with his son on Saturday
afternoon. This was more in depth than “what did you do in Sunday
school” in the car ride home and probably had the benefit of some adult
education as well. Children studied up for this session and fathers took
the time to review in detail, asking questions and offering their own
insights. In The Choosen, as you may recall, this became a weekly battle
between Danny and his father Reb Saunders, as his father probed his
brain and prepared him for succession. My impression from other stories
and memoirs is that in most cases this was not such a high stakes
enterprise, but something remembered with fondness for its love and
sense of closeness. Our parent education programs in the Temple are
meant to provide opportunities for parents to teach their children, but
I am not sure we can really replace the teaching that might go on
around the dinner table, sitting together on the coach, or while
tucking a child into bed.
In earlier centuries, when the rabbis became concerned that people were
not doing parts of the worship that were home rituals, they brought them
into the synagogue. That is why the Orthodox added the morning blessings
to the synagogue service centuries ago, and why several generations ago
the Reform movement added a candle-lighting in Temple on Friday night.
Again, I worry that something is lost in the transfer. Because so many
prayers and rituals have moved to the synagogue, I think many Reform
Jews are under the impression that we don’t pray at home. Bedtime
prayers and morning prayers, a part of Jewish life from the time of the
Mishnah, and still pretty common in the 20th century Reform Jewish
community have almost disappeared. Table blessings are reserved for
Shabbat or for meals eaten at the synagogue. Yet it is exactly this kind
of observance that could meet our needs for everyday spirituality, for
returning eating to a holy activity, and for the consecration of our
homes as sacred spaces.
There are other ways as well that we have let the synagogue take over
mitzvoth that were once done at home. Welcoming guests is something we
often do today through the synagogue, as we hold Shabbat dinners for a
variety of groups and occasions. This year Naomi Parker moved the
membership committee back to more traditional hospitality in providing
an invitation to a home for each new member family on the eve of this
service. My impression is that this is a much warmer welcome to our
congregation and a more meaningful form of hospitality.
Thinking about this survey also made me wonder about the influence of
the community verses the experts, in this case your friends verses the
rabbi. It is not just kids who are influenced by their peers. It is one
thing for me to give a sermon on global warming and the moral hazards of
SUV’s and something else for four of your friends to go out and buy
hybrids. When one of our members chose to celebrate her birthday by
taking her friends out for a day of volunteering, it probably did more
to educate people to the needs of the community ( and was more fun)
than sermons on the desperate needs of the working poor in our
community. It is certainly more enticing to observe Shabbat, when with
your friends you have organized a round of dinners and lunches, which
you will all share in together. At the end of last year a group of
adults who studied together in the parent education program requested
that they have a class for this year as well. My guess is that the group
bonding from that experience is more of an incentive to come to class
than any snappy course description we could have created.
There is a final analogue to this survey, and that is our relationship
to society as a whole. We all make an assumption that it is someone else
who influences what happens in our world. Perhaps in being reminded that
parents have more influence on their children than we might otherwise
believe, we can also recognize that we have the potential for more
influence on our society than we currently assume. Through PACT we are
learning as a congregational Social Justice committee how to influence
local governmental bodies. As a national reform movement we are able to
muster the strength to be a player on important issues such as
immigration Reform. The Jewish community as a whole has taken a
leading role in the struggle against Genocide in Darfur .
As parents, as members of a congregation and community, and as citizens
in a democratic society, it is what we do that matters.